For an external penetration test for example, this includes open-source reconnaissance, a full port scan, enumerating and evaluating every service, manually attempting exploits, and performing application-level testing on unauthenticated portions of web services.ĭuring a bug bounty, no one has ownership over the project. Additionally, they will have a specific methodology they will use to methodically review your organization’s testing scope from top to bottom. During a penetration test you will have a dedicated engineer who is assigned to your project for the duration. One of the disadvantages of a bug bounty program is that no one is holistically reviewing your organization, network, or application. So now let’s dive into the disadvantages of a bug bounty program. Conversely, during a bug bounty program you will have many engineers (thousands, usually) who have the option to test your site, and they will usually be looking for in-depth vulnerabilities that they specialize in.During a penetration test you will have a highly trained engineer who is dedicated to your project and your project alone for the duration of the assessment.Just as a quick recap, the major differences between a penetration test and a bug bounty program are: So with that said, check out the previous blog for one side of the argument, and here we’ll focus on the other side. While Triaxiom Security is a company founded on one-side of that equation (penetration testing), we wanted to present both sides of the argument.

Don’t get us wrong, there are many advantages of a bug bounty program, in fact, we just did an entire blog dedicated to the subject. In this blog, we are going to talk about some of the disadvantages of a bug bounty program compared to a penetration test.

Burp bounty pro